Transmission Line Models
An open-circuited 400 km line arrives 10% high with nothing connected to it. Then corona, insulator grading, and which limit actually binds.
Skip to the animationA transmission line has resistance, inductance and capacitance distributed along its length, and which model applies depends on how much the shunt capacitance matters — which is also what produces the Ferranti effect, surge impedance loading and the limit that actually binds.
Four distributed parameters
| Parameter | Origin | Significance |
|---|---|---|
| R | Conductor material and size | I²R loss; small compared with X |
| L | Magnetic field around the conductor | Dominates voltage drop and stability limit |
| C | Field to ground and between phases | Charging current, Ferranti effect |
| G | Leakage across insulators | Usually negligible except in heavy pollution |
L and C depend on conductor spacing and height, so geometry is a design variable. Bundled conductors exist mostly to reduce L and to control the surface field.
Which model
| Length | Model | Treatment of C |
|---|---|---|
| Under 80 km | Short line | Ignored entirely |
| 80 – 250 km | Medium line, nominal π | Lumped half at each end |
| Over 250 km | Long line | Distributed — hyperbolic functions |
The boundaries are conventions. What changes is how wrong the simpler model is, and what drives it is the charging current — which at 400 kV is substantial even with nothing connected at the far end.
Regulation and the Ferranti effect
Under load the receiving-end voltage falls, and because X ≫ R on a transmission line the drop is mostly I·X. That is why reactive power controls voltage while real power controls frequency — the two are almost decoupled.
On a lightly loaded long line the opposite happens. The charging current is capacitive, so it leads, and its drop across the line's inductance adds to the sending voltage. A 400 km line can arrive 10% high with nothing connected — the Ferranti effect — which is why shunt reactors are switched in at light load.
Surge impedance loading
At SIL, reactive power absorbed by the series inductance exactly equals that generated by the shunt capacitance, so the voltage profile is flat end to end. SIL = V²/Z_s with Z_s = √(L/C) ≈ 400 Ω for an overhead line.
Below SIL the line is a net source of reactive power; above it, a net sink. It is the natural operating point, and how far a line sits from it determines what reactive compensation it needs.
Corona and insulators
When the field at a conductor's surface exceeds roughly 30 kV/cm the air ionises — corona — wasting power, generating radio interference and audible hiss, and worsening in rain. Since surface gradient falls with radius, EHV conductors are made far larger than the current requires, or bundled.
An insulator string has the analogous problem. Stray capacitance to the earthed tower makes the disc nearest the conductor carry the largest share of voltage, so it fails first and string efficiency falls as discs are added. A grading ring adds capacitance to the line conductor and equalises the distribution.
Which limit binds
| Line length | Limiting factor | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Short | Thermal | Conductor temperature and sag |
| Medium | Voltage regulation | The drop becomes unacceptable |
| Long | Stability | The angle across the line cannot grow indefinitely |
A long line is almost never thermally limited — it runs out of stability margin first. Since P ≈ (V₁V₂/X)·sin δ, series capacitors that cancel part of X raise the transfer limit without new conductors.
The numbers you will be asked for
- Voltage regulation
(V_nl − V_fl) / V_fl × 100%
- Surge impedance
Z_s = √(L/C)
≈ 400 Ω overhead, ≈ 40 Ω for cable
- Surge impedance loading
SIL = V² / Z_s
- Power transfer
P = (V₁V₂ / X)·sin δ
- Corona critical voltage
rises with conductor radius and falls with air density
- String efficiency
V_string / (n × V_of_the_worst_disc)
Watch it work
Check yourself
question 1 / 4
One question at a time. Pick an answer to see why it is right or wrong, then move on — there is no score to keep and nothing is saved.